DV Experts, LLC
Courts cannot save children if they are unaware that standard court practices routinely place children in jeopardy.
Good Advice for Conronavirus and for Judges
Most family court custody cases are settled amicably. It’s only about 3.8% of cases that require trial and often much more.
The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges seeks to teach other judges about the ACE (Adverse Childhood Experiences) Research and the Saunders Study.
One of the best decisions I ever made occurred at the start of my work in the domestic violence movement.
Family courts got off to an unfortunate start in the 1970s when domestic violence (DV) became a public issue but virtually no research was available.
Just as custody courts developed responses for domestic violence at a time when no research was available, early proponents of shared parenting sought to experiment when there was no research about shared parenting.
The ACE (Adverse Childhood Experiences) research is a group of studies sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control that establish that children exposed to domestic violence, child abuse and other traumas will suffer more injuries and illnesses throughout their lives and have shorter life expectancies.
Every day I hear horrific stories of courts using deeply flawed and outdated practices that ruin the lives of protective mothers and their children.
Custody courts cannot protect children when they permit a biased theory designed to help abusive fathers take custody from good mothers...
The Only Outcome Family Courts Will Consider
Failure to integrate current scientific research.
What happens when a consumer product in responsible for the deaths of even a few children?
Page 2 of 2